Neonatal vitamin K and jaundice

On Monday, January 17, I posted regarding newborn shots, jaundice and SIDS. Within that post, I talked a little about the vitamin K shot, but today I wanted to elaborate more on the possible relationship between the shot and neonatal jaundice (hyperbilirubinemia). In addition, an earlier post I made today provided information regarding the possible link between neonatal jaundice and the risk for developing autism.

When someone is jaundiced, there is too much bilirubin in the blood. Bilirubin is a neurotoxin. It can cause developmental delay, brain damage, cerebral palsy and sometmies death.

Let's look at the vitamin K injection given at birth. This injection is given to prevent "Vitamin K Deficient Bleeding" in newborns. Since vitamin K is a coagulant, the danger of VKDB is unstoppable bleeding, that sometimes is not immediately obvious. If someone is vitamin K deficient, their blood will not clot. According to Stanford School of Medicine, an infant is at risk of VKDB from the first 24 hours through six months of life. Also according to Stanford, breast milk is very low in vitamin K. However, infant formula is fortified with vitamin K, and contains more than enough.

Below is information taken from the Daily Med section of the National Institute of Health website regarding the vitamin K injection manufactured by Hospira pharmaceuticals. The information provided by Hospira about their own product states that it has been known to be associated with toxicity in newborns. It is also documented that jaundice, or hyperbilirubinemia, may be related to the K1 injection.

Warnings

Benzyl alcohol as a preservative in Bacteriostatic Sodium Chloride Injection has been associated with toxicity in newborns. Data are unavailable on the toxicity of other preservatives in this age group. There is no evidence to suggest that the small amount of benzyl alcohol contained in Vitamin K1 Injection (Phytonadione Injectable Emulsion, USP), when used as recommended, is associated with toxicity.

Pediatric Use

Hemolysis, jaundice, and hyperbilirubinemia in neonates, particularly those that are premature, may be related to the dose of Vitamin K1 Injection. Therefore, the recommended dose should not be exceeded (see ADVERSE REACTIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

So the following are true statements:

* VKBD only occurs somewhere in the range of between 1 and 7 of every 100,000 neonates
* Breast milk contains little vitamin K
* Infant formula is fortified with vitamin K
* Every newborn is recommended to have K1 injection regardless of the feeding plans of the    mother
* Neonatal K1 injection has been linked to jaundice (hyperbilirubinemia)
* Bilirubin is a neurotoxin
* A link between neonatal jaundice and autism is currently being investigated
* There is aluminum in this shot being injected into your child

So, it would be logical to think that if you are planning in advance to feed your newborn formula, then you could skip the K1 injection. If you are expecting a child, has your healthcare provider talked to you about this to help you make a plan? If you've already had children, can you remember if anyone gave you this information? My guess is probably not.

When you are expecting a child, the best thing you can do regarding the K1 shot and childhood vaccines is ask questions. Ask lots of questions. Oh, and do some research too. No one in the healthcare industry is going to tell you anything negative regarding vaccines or any other newborn shot. You have to find the answers yourself. Get educated, speak up and have a say in what gets injected into your little one. Things are never as simple as they seem. Good Luck.

Please also see my previous post from earlier today regarding jaundice and autism.

Neonatal Jaundice Linked to Autism

By Nancy Walsh, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: October 11, 2010
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and
Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner

Full-term neonates with jaundice are at greatly increased risk of later being diagnosed with a disorder of psychological development, a Danish study found.

Jaundiced newborns had an almost 90% higher likelihood of subsequently having any psychological developmental disorder compared with neonates without jaundice (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.21, P=0.001), according to Rikke Damkjær Maimburg, PhD, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and colleagues.

Moreover, those born at term with jaundice had a 56% greater risk of the specific diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder -- a disorder on the autism spectrum -- than those without jaundice (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.30, P=0.028), the researchers reported in the November issue of Pediatrics

Neonatal jaundice typically is caused by increased bilirubin production and inadequate liver excretory function.

Exposure to high levels of bilirubin is neurotoxic in very young children and can be fatal or associated with permanent sequelae.

Recent research also has suggested that even moderate bilirubin exposure in very young children can be harmful, possibly leading to impairments in their development.
In an earlier case-control study, Maimburg and colleagues found a nearly fourfold increased risk of autism among children who had neonatal jaundice.

To further explore this link, along with other possible contributory factors, the Danish researchers conducted a population-based study that included all 733,826 children born in that country between 1994 and 2004, analyzing data from the Danish Medical Birth Register.

A total of 35,766 children had been diagnosed with neonatal jaundice, while 1,721 were given a diagnosis of a disorder of psychological development during childhood.

They found that jaundice was more common among boys, infants born preterm, infants with congenital malformations, and low-birthweight infants.

After stratification for term versus preterm birth, and adjustment for factors such as maternal smoking, birth weight, and gender, the association of neonatal jaundice and any disorder of psychological development was statistically significant for infants born at term (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.56, P=0.011), the researchers reported.

In contrast, preterm infants were not at risk (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.21, P=0.437).
"The difference in risk for term and preterm children might suggest that brain development undergoes a sensitive period with special vulnerability to bilirubin exposure at ~40 weeks of gestation," they observed.

Another possible explanation for the difference in risk between term and preterm infants is that those born before 37 weeks routinely are hospitalized, so the bilirubinemia would be detected and treated promptly.

Risks also were increased for certain specific subtypes of disorders of psychological development. The adjusted hazard ratio for disorders of speech and language was 1.56 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.40, P=0.46), while the hazard ratio for mixed developmental disorders was 1.88 (95% CI 1.17 to 3.02, P=0.009).

Further analysis of children born at term and exposed to bilirubin found other specific factors linked to autism:

• Birth between October and March, adjusted HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.23 to 3.17, P=0.005)
• Parous mother, adjusted HR 2.29 (95% CI 1.44 to 3.63, P=0.001)

Birth during the winter months, according to the researchers, may influence the development of neonatal jaundice because exposure to daylight helps decrease bilirubin levels.

"These results may reflect the different exposures to daylight but also the fact that children born in the winter period are more exposed to other contributing agents, such as infections," they wrote.

And as to why primiparous women were less likely to have jaundiced infants, possible reasons include their lower levels of antibodies and the fact that firstborn children in Denmark typically remain in the hospital for several days, and hyperbilirubinemia would be detected more quickly.
The researchers noted that their results may have been underestimated, because the data on neonatal jaundice were obtained from the Danish National Hospital Register and reflect only the severest cases.

"Additional evidence to distinguish the genetic and environmental components is needed to explain the association between neonatal jaundice and autistic disorders," they concluded.

Link to original article here: http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Autism/22663

Massive Flux of Gas, in Addition to Liquid Oil, at BP Well Blowout in Gulf

ScienceDaily (Feb. 14, 2011) — A new University of Georgia study that is the first to examine comprehensively the magnitude of hydrocarbon gases released during the Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico oil discharge has found that up to 500,000 tons of gaseous hydrocarbons were emitted into the deep ocean. The authors conclude that such a large gas discharge -- which generated concentrations 75,000 times the norm -- could result in small-scale zones of "extensive and persistent depletion of oxygen" as microbial processes degrade the gaseous hydrocarbons.

The study, led by UGA Professor of Marine Sciences Samantha Joye, appears in the early online edition of the journal Nature Geoscience. Her co-authors are Ian MacDonald of Florida State University, Ira Leifer of the University of California-Santa Barbara and Vernon Asper of the University of Southern Mississippi.

The Macondo Well blowout discharged not only liquid oil, but also hydrocarbon gases, such as methane and pentane, which were deposited in the water column. Gases are normally not quantified for oil spills, but the researchers note that in this instance, documenting the amount of hydrocarbon gases released by the blowout is critical to understanding the discharge's true extent, the fate of the released hydrocarbons, and potential impacts on the deep oceanic systems. The researchers explained that the 1,480-meter depth of the blowout (nearly one mile) is highly significant because deep sea processes (high pressure, low temperature) entrapped the released gaseous hydrocarbons in a deep (1,000-1,300m) layer of the water column. In the supplementary online materials, the researchers provide high-definition photographic evidence of the oil and ice-like gas hydrate flakes in the plume waters.

Joye said the methane and other gases likely will remain deep in the water column and be consumed by microbes in a process known as oxidation, which en masse can lead to low-oxygen waters.

"We're not talking about extensive hypoxic areas offshore in the Gulf of Mexico," Joye explained. "But the microbial oxidation of the methane and other alkanes will remove oxygen from the system for quite a while because the time-scale for the replenishment of oxygen at that depth is many decades."

Leifer added that some of the larger gaseous hydrocarbons documented, such as pentane, have significant health implications for humans and potentially for marine life.

The study concludes that separating the gas-induced oxygen depletion from that due to liquid hydrocarbons is difficult, absent further research, because all hydrocarbons contribute to oxygen depletion. Therefore, documenting the total mass of hydrocarbons discharged is critical for understanding the long-term implications for the Gulf's microbial communities, food chain and overall system.

Joye's team examined samples from 70 sites around the leaking wellhead during a research cruise aboard the R/V Walton Smith during late May and early June of 2010. They combined their data with estimates of the volume of oil released to arrive at a figure that allows scientists to quantify, for the first time, the gas discharge in terms of equivalent barrels of oil. They calculated a gas discharge that's the equivalent of either 1.6 to 1.9 or 2.2 to 3.1 million barrels of oil, depending on the method used. Although the estimate reflects the uncertainty still surrounding the discharge, even the lowest magnitude represents a significant increase in the total hydrocarbon discharge.

"These calculations increase the accepted government estimates by about one third," MacDonald said.

The ever-shifting small-scale currents in the Gulf likely have dissipated the plumes and the low oxygen zones associated with them, Joye said, making them difficult if not impossible to find at this point in time. Although gliders are a new platform being used, scientists typically search for subsurface features by dropping instruments from research vessels, a process that's analogous to looking for a feature on Earth's surface by randomly dropping instruments from a height of 1,500 meters (about 5,000 feet) in the atmosphere.

"It's like searching for a needle in the haystack," Joye said. "We may never know what happened to all of that gas."

Joye cautioned against assuming that microbes will rapidly consume the gases released from the well. Undoubtedly, the methane is a feast for them, Joye said, but she also noted that the microbes need nutrients, such as nitrogen, copper and iron. These nutrients are in scarce supply in the Gulf's deep waters, Joye said, and once they are depleted the microbes will cease to grow -- regardless of how much methane is available.

"This study highlights the value of knowledge gained from deep sea hydrate seepage research but also how poorly deep sea processes are understood, such as the role methane hydrates played in forming the deep methane plumes documented by this study," Leifer said. "Deepwater Horizon underscored how ill-prepared the nation is to respond to future accidents. As a nation, we need to hear this deep sea Sputnik wake-up call."

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Institute for Undersea Technology.

Link to original article here: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/110213162733.htm

Georgia Sea Grant oil spill update

Writer: Sam Fahmy, 706/542-5361, sfahmy@uga.edu
Contact: Jill Gambill, 305/542-8975, jgambill@uga.edu

 

Report concludes that nearly 80 percent of oil from Gulf spill remainsMedia briefing featuring Samantha Joye, Charles Hopkinson scheduled for 11 a.m., Aug. 17
Athens, Ga. – A report released today by the Georgia Sea Grant and the University of Georgia concludes that up to 79 percent of the oil released into the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon well has not been recovered and remains a threat to the ecosystem.

The report, authored by five prominent marine scientists, strongly contradicts media reports that suggest that only 25 percent of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill remains.

“One major misconception is that oil that has dissolved into water is gone and, therefore, harmless,” said Charles Hopkinson, director of Georgia Sea Grant and professor of marine sciences in the University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences. “The oil is still out there, and it will likely take years to completely degrade. We are still far from a complete understanding of what its impacts are.”

Co-authors on the paper include Jay Brandes, associate professor, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography; Samantha Joye, professor of marine sciences, UGA; Richard Lee, professor emeritus, Skidaway; and Ming-yi Sun, professor of marine sciences UGA.

Hopkinson and Joye will discuss the report and the fate of gas released into the Gulf of Mexico at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 17. The briefing will be held in Room 261 of the Marine Sciences building on the UGA campus. Reporters can join the briefing via teleconference by dialing toll-free 888-204-5987 and entering access code 2560397.
The group analyzed data from the Aug. 2 National Incident Command Report, which calculated an “oil budget” that was widely interpreted to suggest that only 25 percent of the oil from the spill remained.

Hopkinson notes that the reports arrive at different conclusions largely because the Sea Grant and UGA scientists estimate that the vast majority of the oil classified as dispersed, dissolved or residual is still present, whereas the NIC report has been interpreted to suggest that only the “residual” form of oil is still present.

Hopkinson said that his group also estimated how much of the oil could have evaporated, degraded or weathered as of the date of the report. Using a range of reasonable evaporation and degradation estimates, the group calculated that 70-79 percent of oil spilled into the Gulf still remains. The group showed that it was impossible for all the dissolved oil to have evaporated because only oil at the surface of the ocean can evaporate into the atmosphere and large plumes of oil are trapped in deep water.

Another difference is that the NIC report estimates that 4.9 million barrels of oil were released from the wellhead, while the Sea Grant report uses a figure of 4.1 million barrels since .8 million barrels were piped directly from the well to surface ships and, therefore, never entered Gulf waters.

On a positive note, the group noted that natural processes continue to transform, dilute, degrade and evaporate the oil. They add that circular current known as the Franklin Eddy is preventing the Loop Current from bringing oil-contaminated water from the Gulf to the Atlantic, which bodes well for the East Coast.

Joye said that both the NIC report and the Sea Grant report are best estimates and emphasizes the need for a sustained and coordinated research effort to better understand the impacts of what has become the world’s worst maritime oil spill. She warned that neither report accounted for hydrocarbon gasses such as methane in their oil budgets.

“That’s a gaping hole,” Joye said, “because hydrocarbon gasses are a huge portion of what was ejected from the well.”

Note to editors:

• The complete Georgia Sea Grant/University of Georgia Oil Spill report is available online at http://uga.edu/aboutUGA/joye_pkit/GeorgiaSeaGrant_OilSpillReport8-16.pdf.
• Figures from the report are available at http://uga.edu/aboutUGA/joye_pkit/GeorgiaSeaGrant_OilChart.pdf.

Link to original article here: http://oilspill.uga.edu/2010/08/16/georgia-sea-grant-oil-spill-update/

Supreme Court shields vaccine makers from lawsuits

Article from the LA Times...

The Supreme Court's 6-2 ruling upholds a federal law that offers compensation to victims of side effects from vaccines and prohibits lawsuits.

By David G. Savage

February 22, 2011, 8:36 a.m.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday shielded the nation's vaccine makers from being sued by parents who say their children suffered severe side effects from the drugs.

By a 6-2 vote, the court upheld a federal law that offers compensation to these victims but closes the courthouse door to lawsuits.

Justice Antonin Scalia said the high court majority agreed with Congress that these side effects were "unavoidable" when a vaccine is given to millions of children. If the drug makers could be sued and forced to pay huge claims for devastating injuries, the vaccine industry could be wiped out, he said.

The American Academy of Pediatrics applauded the decision. "Childhood vaccines are among the greatest medical breakthroughs of the last century," said Dr. O. Marion Burton, the group's president. "Today's Supreme Court decision protects children by strengthening our national immunization system and ensuring that vaccines will continue to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in this country."

The ruling was a defeat for the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, who as a child was given a standard vaccination for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. She later suffered a series of seizures and delayed development. Her parents sought compensation for her injuries, but their claim was turned down. They then sued the drug maker in a Pennsylvania court, contending that the vaccine was defectively designed.

A judge and the U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled they were barred from suing, and the Supreme Court affirmed that judgment Tuesday in Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, arguing that Congress did not mean to shield drug makers from suits if their vaccines were defective and prone to cause injuries. Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the decision.david.savage@latimes.com

Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Interview with Dr Andrew Wakefield about the British Medical Journal, science and vaccines - NaturalNews.tv

Experts’ pushing HPV vaccines told to omit death toll

Medical ‘experts’ pushing HPV vaccines told what not to say about them, including their death toll

Ethan A. Huff,
Natural News
Feb 19, 2011

Two British doctors recently wrote a piece in the BBC urging the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) to switch from Merck’s Cervarix human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) Gardasil HPV vaccine, in its mass vaccination program for young girls. And the two “experts” admit that they only say publicly what helps the vaccine to be well received by the public.

“We, as consultants in sexual health, have been told to say nothing publicly that would damage the current (HPV) vaccine campaign,” they state in their piece.

Drs. Colm O’Mahony and Steve Taylor insist that because Gardasil allegedly protects against genital warts as well as HPV, it is superior to Cervarix, which NHS currently administers to young girls. As long as Gardasil is the same price or cheaper than Cervarix, then NHS should use it, wrote the doctors. And if it is more expensive, then Cervarix is the next best option, they say.

But what is missing from their recommendations is the fact that Dr. O’Mahony has been on the advisory boards of both GSK and Merck, and has received “lecture fees” for his services. This clear conflict of interest may be the precise reason why no mention is made in the BBC piece about the countless thousands of young girls that have become debilitated or died from both Cervarix and Gardasil.

Neither Cervarix nor Gardasil has ever even been proven effective. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has known since at least 2003 that HPV is not even linked to cervical cancer, which is the whole reason it is supposedly being pushed in the first place (http://www.naturalnews.com/022404.html). And besides its ineffectiveness, the vaccines are responsible for causing permanent neurological damage, seizures, severe headaches, muscle pain and weakness, joint problems, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, paralysis, pelvic pain, vision and hearing loss, menstrual cycle changes, and swollen lymph nodes, among many other things (http://truthaboutgardasil.org/).

The HPV vaccine scam is precisely that — a scam. It is nothing more than a money-making scheme whereby drug companies work to persuade states and even countries to mandate that all young girls receive the vaccine before entering school.


To learn more about the dangers of the HPV vaccine, visit:http://www.truthaboutgardasil.org


Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12…
http://www.prisonplanet.com/uk-medi…
http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj….
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/031410_HPV_vaccines_doctors.html#ixzz1EOmx2gkJ

SV40 and the Polio vaccine

SV40 stands for Simian Virus 40. This is a cancer causing monkey virus which was found in FDA approved Polio vaccines in 1960.

Excerpt taken from http://sv40foundation.org/

The Discovery of Simian Virus 40 (SV40)

Between 1959 and 1960, Bernice Eddy, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Health (NIH) examined minced rhesus monkey kidney cells under a microscope.[16] These were the cells of the same species of monkeys used to create and produce the oral polio vaccine. Dr. Eddy discovered that the cells would die without any apparent cause. She then took suspensions of the cellular material from these kidney cell cultures and injected them into hamsters. Cancers grew in the hamsters.[17] Shortly thereafter, scientists at the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. discovered what would later be determined to be the same virus identified by Eddy.[18] This virus was named Simian Virus 40 or SV40 because it was the 40th simian virus found in monkey kidney cells.

In 1960, Doctors Benjamin Sweet and Maurice Hilleman, the Merck scientists who named the virus SV40, published their findings: 

Viruses are commonly carried by monkeys and may appear as contaminants in cell cultures of their tissues, especially the kidney . . . . The discovery of this new virus, the vacuolating agent, represents the detection for the first time of a hitherto “non-detectable” simian virus of monkey renal cultures and raises the important question of the existence of other such viruses . . . . As shown in this report, all 3 types of Sabin’s live poliovirus vaccine, now fed to millions of persons of all ages, were contaminated with vacuolating virus.[19]

The vacuolating virus was another name for SV40.

In 1962, Dr. Bernice Eddy published her findings in the journal produced by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. She wrote:

There is now an impressive list of oncogenic (cancer causing) viruses—the rabbit papilloma, polyoma, Rous sarcoma, the leukemia viruses . . . . It has been known for a number of years that monkeys harbor latent viruses . . . . The (SV40) virus was injected at once into 13 newborn hamsters and 10 newborn mice. Subcutaneous neoplasms indistinguishable from those induced by the rhesus monkey kidney extracts developed in 11 of the 13 hamsters between 156 and 380 days . . . .[20]

What happened after 1963 is debated. Government authorities believe that there were no contaminated vaccines released after this period. Others think that this is not the case.  The argument comes down to two sets of evidence: 1) what was actually done by the manufacturers to ensure that SV40 was removed; 2) what various studies have revealed. 

Obviously, the best way to answer this question is for the government to demand (or for manufacturers to volunteer) to open their freezers and allow independent SV40 scientists to test the vaccine materials in cold storage. Given the public health implications one would think that such steps should have been undertaken years ago. They have not. The government has never demanded that independent testing be performed and the manufacturers have never volunteered.

Excerpt from the William Carlsen / SF Chronicle dated July 22, 2001

Last year [2000], a lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles against Lederle by the parents of 2 1/2-year-old Alexander Horwin who died of a brain tumor that later tested positive for SV40. The suit claims that the tumor was caused by SV40 and that he became infected through a 1997 oral polio vaccine.

Kops and attorney Donald MacLachlin represent a New Jersey family that is considering a suit against vaccine manufacturers.

In 1970, surgeons removed a large brain tumor from 2-year-old Mark Moreno. He since has undergone five more surgeries and now wears a protective helmet over the large opening in his cranium where bone grafts never took. Moreno, now 33, lives with his mother and requires daily assistance.

Recent tests show Moreno's tumor was riddled with SV40, according to the lawyers.

Eileen Moreno, Mark's mother, believes her son's brain tumor was caused by SV40 and that he was infected through the oral polio vaccine in 1968.

Subsequent studies performed in the early 1960s demonstrated that SV40 caused brain tumors in animals[21] and that SV40 could transform or turn cancerous normal human tissue in vitro.[22] A disturbing experiment performed during this era also suggested that SV40 could cause human cancers in man in vivo.[23] In 1964, Fred Jensen and his colleagues took tissue from patients who were terminally ill with cancer.[24] They exposed the tissue to SV40 and then after it was transformed, they implanted the tissue back into the patient.[25] These implants grew into tumors in their human hosts.[26] This suggested the possibility that SV40 could cause cancers in man.

HPV Vaccine Damage Is the New Autism

Here's an interesting article from Dr. David Clark, a functional neurologist, regarding the Gardasil HPV vaccine. I'm not too sure about the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, specifically, but it's entirely logical that mercury could cause neurological damage when included in any vaccine. Watch the video. Read the article. Do your own research.

Dr. David Clark, August 7, 2010

"There are literally thousands of young girls and women in this country right now that have been damaged by the Gardasil vaccine.  You probably haven’t heard of any of these women but I’ve posted on this issue before. The scientific literature is now starting to fill up with case reports and studies and articles that irrefutably show that there is a connection between this vaccine (and it’s an ugly vaccine) and neurological damage.

Now what kind of damage are we talking about?  Well if you simply Google HPV vaccine side effects or vaccine damage, you’re going to find the walking dead.  You'll see girls that went from smiling and happy one day to being in a wheelchair...from happy to looking like they’ve had a stroke.

It’s like the HPV Vaccine was nuclear bomb that exploded inside their body. 

This vaccine is a really nasty vaccine and the reason HPV vaccine damage is the new autism is because what’s happening to this generation of girls is what happened (and it’s still happening) to a whole generation of children that got dosed with mercury in the MMR vaccine. 

SIDE NOTE: mercury is not the only thing that causes autism.  Believe me, I’ve spent 10 years working with these kids and mercury's not the only factor. Many times it’s the damage from the vaccine, the immunological assault from this vaccine that is catastrophic. 

What usually happens to these women and young girls is they now have autoimmune diseases. What that means is that their immune system has been tricked.  It’s been pushed into a state where it’s now attacking their own tissue. These autoimmune conditions won't necessarily have a name like Multiple Sclerosis or Lupus...but these women and young girls STILL have an autoimmune condition.

What tissues can be attacked and destroyed--causing a tidal wave of problems?  The GI system...the brain...their heart...their muscles.  The immune system can attack anything it wants because remember...
Normally your immune system is kind of naïve when it comes to your own tissue.  It’s never really seen that before and it knows if you will, that it’s not supposed to mobilize and try to kill your own tissues.

With the vaccine damage, especially this vaccine, the immune system gets tricked into thinking that the covering around the nerves in the brain (myelin) needs to be killed.  And so what happens you get a child or young woman who looks like they’re having some sort of acute stroke or maybe even an MS, a Multiple Sclerosis type symptom, and really what they have is they have post vaccine damage.

If you’re thinking at all about giving your child an HPV vaccine, I tell you from the bottom of my heart, after seeing some of these women and young girls...don’t do it. 
The AAP, the American Academy of Pediatrics lists the HPV vaccine on their standard vaccine schedule. I wouldn’t do it.

I understand that HPV, Human Papillomavirus, is associated with some types of cervical cancer.  I understand why women would want this vaccine to be okay but listen to me... it’s no okay. 
I’m not sure if we’re going to be able to return some of these women and young girls back to a 100% pre-HPV vaccine status.  The good news is that there are things that we can do to repair the damage. There are things that we can do to analyze and dissect their immune system and try to bring it back into some balance, back into some sort of regularity, but it’s going take time.  

Not only do these women and young girls have stroke-like damage, MS-like damage... they have now a brain that is weak, a brain that is not working correctly.
So some of these vaccine damage girls have attention deficit problems, verbal communication problems, crushing fatigue and weakness.  These women and girls need two kinds of help:

1. Metabolic, biochemical rescue and rehabilitation
2. Neurological re-training, brain-based rehab

...and we’re gonna be able to do both.  
Here's the takeaway:  

This vaccine is doing to these women what the combo MMR vaccine did to hundreds of thousands of children in the last 10 to 15 years.  It’s causing catastrophic neurological metabolic, and endocrinel damage. I implore you don’t give this vaccine to your child. 

if you’ve got a child with HPV Vaccine damage, there is help."